ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Point-of-Care Diagnostic Technologies for Antimicrobial Resistance: Principles, Platforms, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an ever-growing threat to global healthcare. It is largely driven by delayed or inadequate pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in routine clinical workflows. By the time the clinician receives results to guide treatment from traditional culture-based diagnostics, several days may have elapsed, leading to the use and potential over-prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the development of resistant pathogens. A rapid and clinically actionable diagnostic approach at the clinical point of care (POC) may help address this gap. This review examines current and emerging POC diagnostic technologies for AMR and outlines the fundamental principles and mechanistic classifications of POC diagnostic technologies. These include phenotypic, genotypic, immunological, and biosensor-based approaches. A critical overview of key technological platforms, including rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), microfluidics and isothermal nucleic acid amplification (e.g., LAMP and RPA), CRISPR-based diagnostics, nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors, and mobile-integrated systems is provided. The impact of POC diagnostics on antimicrobial stewardship, time to appropriate therapy, and patient outcomes in primary care settings, hospitals, intensive care units, and resource-limited settings is presented and discussed. In addition to clinical implementation challenges, this review considers the issues of analytical performance, workflow, regulatory pathways, cost, and implementation readiness. In addition, it outlines key trends regarding digital integration, surveillance, workforce training, and policy frameworks. Overall, the review outlines the role of POC diagnostics in enhancing antimicrobial response surveillance and the global fight against AMR. Among emerging platforms, rapid phenotypic AST, microfluidic and isothermal-based assays, CRISPR-based diagnostics, and integrated biosensor systems show the greatest potential for near-term clinical impact; however, widespread implementation remains constrained by challenges related to clinical validation, cost, workflow integration, and alignment with antimicrobial stewardship frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.