ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rapid Molecular Diagnostics for Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those receiving hemodialysis. Delayed identification of pathogens and their resistance profiles can lead to inappropriate therapy and adverse outcomes. This review evaluates rapid molecular diagnostic approaches for detecting pathogens and resistance markers in BSI, with emphasis on their application in CKD. These technologies provide faster microbiological information by enabling direct or accelerated detection of pathogens and selected resistance determinants. Clinical studies indicate that their use supports prompt adjustment of antimicrobial therapy, especially when combined with antimicrobial stewardship and applied after blood culture positivity. In CKD, identification of the causative organism facilitates treatment selection aligned with renal function and helps reduce unnecessary exposure to nephrotoxic agents. However, diagnostic accuracy differs among platforms, and detection of resistance genes does not consistently reflect phenotypic susceptibility. Furthermore, most evidence is derived from mixed hospital populations rather than CKD-specific cohorts. These factors require careful interpretation within the clinical context. Rapid molecular diagnostics can enhance antimicrobial decision-making in BSI, but their effectiveness depends on integration with conventional microbiology and structured care pathways. Further research in CKD populations is required to clarify their impact on clinical outcomes and to support implementation in nephrology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.