ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence for Tuberculosis Screening and Detection: From Evidence to Policy and Implementation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Care: Selected Applications in Tuberculosis, Sepsis, and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support tuberculosis (TB) screening and diagnosis, particularly through computer-aided detection (CAD) applied to chest radiography (CXR). However, the programmatic value of AI depends not only on diagnostic accuracy but also on implementation context, threshold calibration, and integration into diagnostic pathways. We conducted a narrative, state-of-the-art review of AI applications across the TB diagnosis pathway. Evidence was synthesized from World Health Organization policy documents, independent validation initiatives, and peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2026, with a structured selection process aligned with PRISMA principles. CAD for CXR is the most mature AI application and is recommended by WHO for TB screening and triage among individuals aged ≥15 years in specific contexts. Across studies, CAD-CXR demonstrates sensitivity comparable to human readers, although performance varies by product, population, and imaging conditions, necessitating local threshold calibration. Evidence from implementation studies suggests improvements in screening efficiency and potential cost-effectiveness in high-burden settings. Other AI modalities, including computed tomography (CT)-based imaging analysis, point-of-care ultrasound interpretation, cough or stethoscope sound analysis, clinical risk models, and genomic resistance prediction show promising but heterogeneous results, with most requiring further independent validation and prospective evaluation. AI has the potential to strengthen TB screening and diagnostic pathways, but its impact depends on integration into health systems and evaluated using patient- and program-level outcomes rather than accuracy alone. A differentiated approach is needed, with responsible scale-up of policy-endorsed tools alongside rigorous evaluation of emerging technologies to support effective and equitable TB care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.