ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Scattering Problems.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inverse scattering problems seek anomalies in a medium given data measured after the interaction with emitted waves. Due to noise, predictions about the nature of these inclusions should be complemented with uncertainty estimates. To this end, we propose a progressive framework for inverse scattering from low- to high-dimensional Bayesian formulations depending on the prior information and the problem complexity. We aim to reduce computational costs by exploiting educated prior information. When we look for a few well-separated inclusions in a known medium with information about their number, we resort to low-dimensional parameterizations in terms of a few random variables representing their shape and material constants. We test this approach detecting anomalies in tissues and deposits in stratified subsoils. In more complex situations where the anomalies may overlap, we propose high-dimensional parameterizations obtained from Karhunen-Loève (KL) or Fourier expansions of the density and velocity fields. We employ these methods to characterize oil and gas reservoirs in a salt dome configuration, where the screening effect of the dome cap prevents the obtention of adequate prior information. We characterize the posterior probability by means of affine invariant ensemble and functional ensemble MCMC samplers depending on dimensionality. This provides information on configurations with the highest a posteriori probability and the uncertainty around them, identifying factors that could reduce the uncertainty. In high-dimensional setups, techniques based on KL developments are more effective and stable. A recurring issue is the choice of the a priori covariance (which strongly affects the results) and the choice of its hyperparameters. Here, we use educated choices. Formulations that include them as additional parameters could be a next step at a higher cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.