ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Power Distribution Internet of Things Security Risk Evaluation Based on Combined Weighting and Cloud Model.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the interconnection and intercommunication of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, the security risks of Power Distribution Internet of Things (PDIoT) systems have increased accordingly. How to monitor and assess these risks has become a key issue for advancing the construction and implementation of PDIoT. The traditional security evaluation methods mostly adopt a single weighting method and membership function, which are highly susceptible to subjective factors and have the characteristics of fuzziness and uncertainty. To address the problems, this paper proposes a security risk evaluation method of the PDIoT based on a combined weighting and cloud model. We first analyze the factors of security risks in PDIoT systems. A security evaluation index system for PDIoT was established based on factors from three aspects: the perception layer, network layer, and application layer, including 3 first-level indicators and 16 second-level indicators. Then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM) are adopted for combined weighting to optimize the weight of each index; the cloud model is employed to calculate the standard evaluation and the comprehensive evaluation cloud. Subsequently, validity verification and cloud similarity calculation are performed to get the security state of the PDIoT. Finally the security evaluation level of the PDIoT system is obtained. An empirical test was conducted by taking the PDIoT of Meizhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid as an example. The experimental results show that our method has better result distinguishability than the other three classical methods, allowing risk levels to be identified more clearly and intuitively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.