ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mapping Vulnerability: Structure, Cascades, and Resilience in the Global Railway Vans Trade Network.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- More Links but Fewer Effective Routes: Entropy and Resilience in Global Lithium, Cobalt and Nickel Trade Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multiplexity and Disruption Propagation in Global Container Liner Shipping Networks: From the Perspective of Carriers' Geopolitical Affiliations.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global supply chains face increasing vulnerability to disruptions from geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and demand shocks. The global trade network for railway vans, critical for transcontinental freight transport, remains understudied despite its foundational role in global logistics. This study addresses the gap in understanding how the railway vans trade network structure evolves and responds to different types of shocks, moving beyond static analyses to capture dynamic vulnerabilities. Using UN Comtrade data (2013-2024), multi-level network analysis examined structural evolution at macroscopic, mesoscopic, and microscopic scales. Three risk propagation models simulated supply disruption, demand shock, and cooperation disruption scenarios to assess systemic vulnerabilities. The network transformed from a polycentric to core-periphery structure, with China dominating exports (67 partners in 2024) and Germany leading European integration. Supply disruptions from Romania and Czechia affected up to 114 countries under low risk absorption capacity (α = 0.1), while demand shocks from the USA impacted 53 countries. The disruption of strategic trade links, such as China-Australia, triggered severe systemic risks. The systemic criticality of risk sources varies by shock type, requiring context-specific resilience strategies. The findings guide policymakers in identifying critical vulnerabilities and designing targeted interventions for enhancing supply chain resilience in infrastructure sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.