Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42072526›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Stable Boundaries of Opinion Dynamics in Heterogeneous Spatial Complex Networks.

Mats Bierwirth, Johannes Lengler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mats BierwirthDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-6470-4455
Johannes LenglerDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0004-7629

Funding

German National Academic Foundation personal grantSwiss National Science Foundation 200021- 23206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate majority-vote opinion dynamics on Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs (GIRGs), a powerful model for spatial complex networks. In contrast to classic coarsening dynamics, where a single opinion typically achieves global consensus, our simulations reveal that sufficiently large, localized opinion domains do not disappear. Instead, they stabilize, leading to a persistent coexistence of competing opinions. To understand the mechanism behind this arrested coarsening, we develop and analyze a tractable mean-field model of the interface between two opinion domains. Our main theoretical result rigorously establishes the existence of a stable, non-trivial limiting distribution for the interface profile in a mean-field analysis. This demonstrates that the boundary between opinions is stationary, providing a mathematical explanation for how complex network geometry can support robust opinion diversity in social systems.

Indexed as

arrested coarseningcomplex networksGeometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs (GIRGs)majority-vote modelmean-field analysisopinion dynamicssocial influencestable interfaces

Identifiers

PMID42072526
PMCPMC13114799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.