Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42072505›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

When Wholes Resist Decomposition: A Spectral Measure of Epistemic Emergence.

Mark Bailey, Susan Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark BaileyDepartment of AI, Cyber, Influence and Data Science, National Intelligence University, Bethesda, MD 20816, USA.
Susan SchneiderCenter for the Future Mind, AI & Society, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1366-1723

Funding

NSF Learn Project Award #1524601William F. Dietrich Fund NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-agent and distributed dynamical systems can exhibit coordinated behavior that is difficult to summarize in terms of independent parts. Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides one influential notion of system-level irreducibility, but exact computation of causal Φ remains intractable except in very small systems. In this work, we introduce Φspectral, a scalable observer-relative statistic defined on pairwise mutual information networks extracted from multivariate time-series data. A normalized graph Laplacian and its Fiedler vector identify a bipartition of the mutual information graph, and Φspectral reports the normalized weight of informational coupling crossing that cut. The measure is inspired by IIT's concern with irreducibility but is not equivalent to intrinsic causal Φ: it is pairwise, undirected, and functional/statistical rather than intervention-based. We evaluate it on four exploratory simulation regimes: random oscillators, a transitional Kuramoto-like synchronization regime, a perfectly synchronized regime, and a combinatorial threshold-linear network (CTLN). Across these cases, Φspectral is most useful as a measure of observer-relative integration under second-order dependencies, separating redundancy-dominated from transiently differentiated regimes. The current results should be read as a proof-of-concept rather than as a formal validation against exact IIT. We discuss relations to weak IIT, Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT), and the perturbational complexity index (PCI), and we outline the stationary benchmarking and small-system validation needed for stronger causal claims.

Indexed as

complex systemsepistemic emergenceintegrated informationirreducibilitymulti-agent systemsmutual informationspectral graph theoryweak IIT

Identifiers

PMID42072505
PMCPMC13114387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.