ReviewBiomedicines2026
DSS Colitis Model: Traps, Tricks, and Reporting Recommendations.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-Derived Tryptophan Metabolites Regulate AhR Signaling to Restore Epithelial Barrier Integrity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Article
- Translational Animal Models in Colitis: From Rodents to Pig and Minipig Platforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Probiotic Mixture Neuralli™-CORE Attenuates DSS-Induced Colitis by Enhancing Gut Microbiota Resilience in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- ANGPT1-GABARAP axis modulates NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in Crohn's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Probiotic-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Nano-Immunotherapeutic Platforms in IBD: A Clinician's Perspective.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis model is the most widely used experimental model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) due to its simplicity and versatility, with over 7000 PubMed entries in the last decade and an exponential rise in recent years. Since its initial description in 1985, DSS colitis has been extensively evaluated across species, most notably in mice and rats, and has yielded substantial insights into IBD pathogenesis. However, the model's multifactorial nature poses a dual challenge: it offers an opportunity but complicates study design, interpretation, and translational relevance. This complexity is worsened by inconsistent reporting, which hampers reproducibility and comparability across studies. The broad use of the DSS-induced colitis model yields numerous insights about the model, which help better understand its complexity, characteristics and limitations. Although DSS colitis is induced locally, inflammation in the colon and gut barrier destruction may also affect other organs (such as the liver and brain) and their metabolism and molecular responses, which, in turn, may interfere with colitis-underlying mechanisms and drug response, and may influence the interpretation of results. These intrinsic (intra-experimental) characteristics of the DSS model are summarised in the paper (colitis, gut-brain axis, gut-liver axis). In addition, the DSS model is heavily influenced by numerous extrinsic (inter-experimental) factors (environmental, microbiological, genetic), which may further complicate the colitis model, the study outcomes, and data interpretation, and these are also discussed in the paper. As science advances and new data accumulate, understanding the intricate interplay among internal mechanisms, external factors, and technical variables becomes increasingly essential for the accurate interpretation of DSS outcomes. This review synthesises the complexity and interdependence of factors shaping the DSS model, emphasising the need for meticulous reporting and consideration of methodological nuances to enhance reproducibility, interpretation, and translational value in DSS colitis research. In addition, the review provides practical guidance through a "traps and tricks" subsection and checklist table designed to provide a framework and practical recommendations to better understand, apply, and interpret DSS model results in the context of broader systemic and methodological considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.