ReviewBiomedicines2026
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Bridging and Downstaging: Advances in Locoregional Therapy.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment with Curative Purpose of Early, Intermediate and Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of Liver Function and Tumor Burden Scores in Patients with HCC After Transarterial Radioembolization - Retrospective Single Center Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major contributor to global cancer mortality, with many patients presenting beyond the bounds of upfront curative therapy (resection/transplant). Locoregional therapies, particularly transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial embolization (TAE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE), therefore play an essential role in bridging and downstaging strategies designed to enable curative intent in otherwise ineligible patients. Bridging therapy aims to maintain transplant eligibility and reduce waitlist dropout, whereas downstaging seeks to reduce tumor burden to meet accepted criteria for resection or transplantation. This review synthesizes current evidence on TACE, TAE, and TARE for bridging to resection and transplantation, as well as for downstaging to surgical eligibility, drawing from systematic reviews and cohort studies in the recent literature. We examine modality-specific outcomes, contextualized by tumor biology, liver function, and treatment selection criteria. Comparative effectiveness and the need for standardized outcome measures will be highlighted, reflecting heterogeneity in study endpoints and patient populations. Finally, future directions in personalized locoregional therapy, integration with systemic therapies, and refined conversion strategies will be discussed, with emphasis on the need for consensus in defining treatment success. By integrating evolving clinical evidence with practical application, this review will help clarify the expanding role of locoregional therapies in enabling curative-intent strategies for HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.