Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42072262›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Using Large Language Models to Generate Dietary Feedback Similar to Human Experts in Weight Management: Experiments on Real-World Scenario Data.

Ruixin Dai, Liping Cui, Kun Hu, Jiye An, Ning Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruixin DaiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8702-4565
Liping CuiGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
Kun HuGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
Jiye AnMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Ning DengMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6573-1061

Funding

Key R&D Program Project of Guangxi AB24010030Key R&D Program Project of Henan 251111313700Key R&D Program Project of Ningxia 2026BEG02005National Natural Science Foundation of China 82472113Ningxia Health Commission Research Project 2026-NWZD-A002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing dietary feedback is important for promoting healthy behaviors in weight management, but the rapid development of obesity and the shortage of medical nutrition human resources have limited this health service. The rise of large language models (LLMs) offers the possibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) to simulate the behavior of human dietitians. However, existing studies have only explored LLM performance when generating answers to common nutrition-related questions; the use of LLMs to generate situation-adapted dietary feedback in practical weight management scenarios still needs further research. In this study, we collected dietary records and dietary feedback from primary dietitians through an mHealth weight management application. We conducted topic modeling to generalize how dietitians deliver nutrition guidance in real-world dietary feedback scenarios. Combining the in-context learning capability of LLMs with real-world data, we proposed a synthetic data generation approach (HDI-SDG) and trained an LLM for dietary feedback with the synthetic data (LLMDF-EXP). Experiments on automatic and manual evaluation of LLMDF-EXP and an LLM trained directly with the real-world data as well as generalized LLMs illustrated that LLMDF-EXP performed most similarly to human experts. Notably, there were no significant differences from human experts in terms of professionalism (

Indexed as

dietary feedbacklarge language modelreal-world scenario datatopic modelingweight management

Identifiers

PMID42072262
PMCPMC13113237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.