ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vision-Language Models in Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The demand for advanced detection methods and accurate staging remains a global challenge in cancer diagnosis. Even though traditional deep learning models in medical imaging achieve high precision, they suffer from limited explainability and multimodal reasoning due to their black-box nature, thereby limiting their clinical applicability. To address this gap, recent research has increasingly explored multimodal approaches that integrate visual and textual clinical data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of 408 publications from 2021 to 2025, collected from Web of Science and Scopus, using VOSviewer and R-Bibliometrix to map citation networks, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrences. The results reveal a rapid growth from 1 publication in 2021 to 269 in 2025, with significant contributions from leading countries and institutions. Thematic analysis indicates a shift from conventional convolutional approaches toward transformer-based and self-supervised methods, alongside increasing attention to multimodal learning in cancer imaging tasks such as breast, lung, and brain cancer analysis. Overall, this study provides a structured overview of the evolving research landscape, highlighting key trends, emerging themes, and research gaps to inform future developments in multimodal artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.