Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42072257›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Optimized Signal Acquisition and Advanced AI for Robust 1D EMG Classification: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Reinforcement Learning.

Anagha Shinde, Virendra Shete, Ninad Mehendale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anagha ShindeMIT School of Engineering and Science, MIT ADT Campus, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, Loni Kalbhor, Pune 412201, India.ORCID 0009-0001-0947-8823
Virendra SheteMIT School of Engineering and Science, MIT ADT Campus, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, Loni Kalbhor, Pune 412201, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-8940
Ninad MehendaleK. J. Somaiya School of Engineering, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, Mumbai 400077, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-5076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) signals are critical for prosthetic control, rehabilitation, and human-machine interaction, yet their classification remains challenging due to noise, non-stationarity, and inter-subject variability. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches for 1D EMG signal classification, with a systematic evaluation of signal acquisition parameters. Using both synthetic and real-world EMG datasets, we demonstrate that 8-10 bit quantization and a 2000 Hz sampling rate provide optimal signal fidelity while maintaining data efficiency. Among the evaluated models, ensemble methods (Gradient Boosting, Voting Ensemble) and advanced DL architectures (LSTM, Transformer) achieved superior performance on real EMG data, with accuracies reaching 100% and 96.3%, respectively. Notably, reinforcement learning agents (Deep Q-Networks) demonstrated 100% accuracy on multiclass synthetic data, revealing their potential for learning complex bio-signal representations. Our findings establish that meticulous optimization of preprocessing pipelines, combined with robust AI models, significantly enhances EMG classification accuracy. This work provides empirical guidance for selecting optimal acquisition parameters and AI architectures for practical EMG analysis systems, with direct implications for prosthetic control and rehabilitation technologies.

Indexed as

classificationdeep learningEMG signalmachine learningquantizationreinforcement learningsampling ratesignal processing

Identifiers

PMID42072257
PMCPMC13113153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.