ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimized Signal Acquisition and Advanced AI for Robust 1D EMG Classification: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Reinforcement Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electromyography (EMG) signals are critical for prosthetic control, rehabilitation, and human-machine interaction, yet their classification remains challenging due to noise, non-stationarity, and inter-subject variability. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches for 1D EMG signal classification, with a systematic evaluation of signal acquisition parameters. Using both synthetic and real-world EMG datasets, we demonstrate that 8-10 bit quantization and a 2000 Hz sampling rate provide optimal signal fidelity while maintaining data efficiency. Among the evaluated models, ensemble methods (Gradient Boosting, Voting Ensemble) and advanced DL architectures (LSTM, Transformer) achieved superior performance on real EMG data, with accuracies reaching 100% and 96.3%, respectively. Notably, reinforcement learning agents (Deep Q-Networks) demonstrated 100% accuracy on multiclass synthetic data, revealing their potential for learning complex bio-signal representations. Our findings establish that meticulous optimization of preprocessing pipelines, combined with robust AI models, significantly enhances EMG classification accuracy. This work provides empirical guidance for selecting optimal acquisition parameters and AI architectures for practical EMG analysis systems, with direct implications for prosthetic control and rehabilitation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.