ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning-Assisted Early Detection of Skin Cancer from Dermoscopic Images in Underserved Clinical Settings.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is caused by aberrant cells that proliferate uncontrollably after unrepaired DNA damage results in mutations in the epidermis. The majority of skin cancer is caused by high UV exposure from the sun, tanning beds, or sunlamps. Due to sociocultural hurdles, limited access to specialized dermatological care, and low public knowledge, many nations, including India, have higher mortality rates and late-stage presentations. The unequal distribution of specialized dermatological treatments, particularly in rural and underdeveloped areas, makes detection and treatment more difficult. For skin cancer, one of the most prevalent malignancies with a high death rate, early detection is crucial. This study gathered 1200 dermoscopic images from two clinics in Himachal Pradesh in order to solve these problems. In order to automatically classify dermoscopic clinical images into melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer categories, this study compares VGG16 with ResNet-50. Preprocessing, lesion segmentation, and classification are all part of the suggested approach. A collection of 1200 dermoscopic images with clinical annotations was used to improve the models. ResNet-50 outperformed VGG16 in tests, with 93% accuracy and 96% AUC-ROC as opposed to 89% and 94%, respectively. These results emphasize how crucial model selection and preprocessing are to diagnostic performance. Ensemble methods, multi-class classification, explainability integration, and clinical validation will be investigated in order to facilitate the implementation of AI-assisted dermatological diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.