ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
ERG-Graph: Graph Signal Processing of the Electroretinogram for Classification of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders remain an unmet clinical need. The electroretinogram (ERG), a non-invasive recording of the retinal response to light, has shown promise as a physiological marker for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), yet existing classification approaches based on time-domain and time-frequency features achieve limited accuracy in clinically relevant multi-group scenarios. This study introduces ERG-Graph, a novel graph signal processing (GSP) framework that transforms each ERG waveform into a weighted, undirected graph through amplitude quantization and temporal-adjacency connectivity. Nine topological and spectral features, including total load centrality, clique number, algebraic connectivity, and clustering coefficient, were extracted from each graph to characterize the structural dynamics of the signal. Using light-adapted ERG recordings from 278 participants (ASD = 77, ADHD = 43, ASD + ADHD = 21, Control = 137), we evaluated these features across binary, three-group, and four-group classification scenarios using seven machine learning classifiers with 10-fold subject-wise cross-validation. The proposed ERG-Graph features achieved balanced accuracies of 0.91 (ASD vs. control, males) and 0.88 (ADHD vs. control, females). Critically, fusing ERG-Graph with time-domain features yielded a balanced accuracy of 0.81 for three-group classification (ASD vs. ADHD vs. control), representing an 11-percentage-point improvement over the previous benchmark of 0.70. Statistical analysis confirmed significant topological differences between groups (Kruskal-Wallis,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.