ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering: Biological Principles, Engineered Substitutes, and Preclinical Outcomes.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gelatin-Based Multifunctional Hydrogels for Sports Injury Repair: Musculoskeletal and Nervous System Perspectives.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising popularity of sports practiced without adequate preparation has increased the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly among young individuals. Because the ACL has a very limited intrinsic healing capacity, surgical reconstruction-most often using autologous grafts-remains the standard of care. However, current techniques frequently lead to donor-site morbidity and do not consistently restore long-term joint stability, contributing to early post-traumatic osteoarthritis in active patients. Over the past decades, tissue engineering (TE) has opened promising avenues for developing biological substitutes capable of overcoming these limitations. Despite substantial progress, no strategy has yet demonstrated reliable and clinically validated functional regeneration of the human ACL. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is emerging as a complementary tool for diagnosis, surgical planning, biomechanical assessment, and personalized reconstruction strategies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current TE-based approaches for ACL repair and reconstruction, analyzes their biological and biomechanical limitations, and discusses emerging concepts that may enhance future clinical outcomes. We first summarize the fundamental principles of tissue engineering, then examine the major strategies proposed for ACL regeneration-highlighting their respective strengths and shortcomings-and finally outline perspectives for a novel approach currently under development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.