ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Configurable Modular EEG Classification Framework with Multiscale Features and Ensemble Learning: A Reproducible Evaluation for Schizophrenia Detection.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EEG-based classification of mental disorders has increasingly relied on deep learning models, which are computationally intensive and difficult to interpret, limiting reproducibility and clinical deployment in resource-constrained or cross-site settings. We propose a configurable and modular machine learning framework for EEG-based classification that emphasizes interpretability, flexibility, and rigorous evaluation using schizophrenia detection as a representative use case. Our framework integrates standardized preprocessing, multiscale feature extraction, minimum redundancy-maximum relevance feature selection, and configurable ensemble learning. It also supports multiple validation strategies, including random splits, k-fold cross-validation, and leave-one-subject-out (LOSO), enabling systematic assessment of subject-level generalization. We evaluated the framework on two open EEG datasets: Warsaw IPN (Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, 19 channels, 250 Hz; 28 subjects) and a Moscow adolescent cohort (16 channels, 128 Hz; 84 subjects). Results show that validation strategy strongly affects model performance. While K-fold validation yielded epoch-level accuracies of 98.06% and 91.47%, LOSO results were much lower: 76.12% (epoch-level) and 82.14% (subject-level) for Dataset 1, and 70.71% (epoch-level) and 77.38% (subject-level) for Dataset 2. These findings demonstrate the risk of overestimated performance due to data leakage and underscore the importance of subject-independent evaluation. Our proposed framework provides a low-complexity, interpretable, and extensible benchmark for reproducible EEG-based machine learning, with interpretable feature representations linked to EEG dynamics and potential applicability to broader neuroengineering and clinical decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.