ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Depth-Dependent Performance of Residual Networks for Low-Count PET Image Restoration Using a Dedicated 3D-Printed Striatum Phantom.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility Study of Deep Learning-Driven Image Restoration for Fast, Low-Count [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-count positron emission tomography (PET) is inherently affected by Poisson-dominated noise, which degrades image contrast, structural delineation, and quantitative reliability. This study systematically evaluated residual learning-based deep neural networks to investigate the influence of residual block depth on PET image restoration performance under low-count conditions. We employed a physically controlled striatum phantom, fabricated using 3D printing technology, to ensure reproducible acquisition conditions and controlled physical variability. PET images were acquired using a clinical PET/computed tomography (CT) system with list-mode acquisition. Low-count images reconstructed from short-duration acquisition were paired with high-count reference images reconstructed from extended acquisitions. We compared conventional filtering techniques, including median, Wiener, and modified median Wiener filters, with residual network (ResNet)-based models incorporating 8, 16, and 32 residual blocks. Image quality was quantitatively assessed using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), coefficient of variation (COV), line profile analysis, universal quality index (UQI), and perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS). The results demonstrated that ResNet-based restorations substantially outperformed conventional filtering techniques in contrast recovery, signal stability, and structural preservation. The ResNet-16 model achieved the most balanced performance, yielding the highest CNR (9.02) and lowest COV (0.105), while also demonstrating superior structural and perceptual similarity, as indicated by UQI (0.9224) and LPIPS (0.0174), relative to the high-count reference images. Deeper network configurations exhibited diminishing returns and reduced structural consistencies. These findings indicate that an intermediate residual block depth is optimal for low-count PET image restoration and highlight the importance of architectural optimization in deep learning-based PET image enhancement with phantom-based evaluation frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.