ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Antioxidants as Therapeutic Tools in the Management of COPD: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Beyond established risk factors such as smoking and exposure to pollutants increasing evidence emphasizes the role of oxidative stress (OS) in COPD pathophysiology. OS contributes to chronic inflammation, to the progression of the disease and affects both lung function and exacerbations, which opens a rationale for the use of antioxidant and redox-modulating substances in the treatment of the disease. Although numerous substances with antioxidant capacity have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), their clinical relevance remains uncertain. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effects of these therapies in COPD. Also, a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects on exacerbations was performed. Nineteen RCTs meet the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Quantitative analyses were performed using random-effects models. N-acetylcysteine-based interventions were associated with a significant reduction in exacerbation risk (risk ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.98), corresponding to a 20% relative reduction. No study reported serious adverse effects. These findings suggest that antioxidant-based strategies may have clinically meaningful benefits in COPD. However, larger, more robust RCTs are required to confirm these results and establish optimal therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.