ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Digital Microscopy for Counting Mitotic Figures in Cutaneous Neoplasms of Dogs and Cats.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of digitized slides for histopathological diagnosis has become common in veterinary pathology, and the validation of diagnostic techniques that are extrapolated from the evaluation of glass slides is needed. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of counting mitotic figures in physical glass slides and digitized slides of cutaneous tumors of dogs and cats. The mitotic count was performed by three pathologists on glass and digitized slides of ninety skin tumors, including 30 squamous cell carcinomas in dogs and cats, 30 mast cell tumors and 30 soft tissue tumors in dogs. An additional assessment of cellular proliferation was performed with immunohistochemistry for Ki67. Spearman's correlation for the mean count of mitotic figures between the three observers on physical and digitized slides demonstrated a strong positive correlation for squamous cell carcinomas and mesenchymal tumors and a moderate correlation for mast cell tumors. Inter-observer agreement was moderate between the two methods. In conclusion, the results found suggest that digitized slides can be used reliably for mitotic figure counting in cutaneous neoplasms in small animals, without compromising their classification or prediction of prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.