ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Comparison and Agreement of Echocardiographic Volumetric Methods for Quantifying Mitral Regurgitation in Dogs with Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative mitral regurgitation and conventional echocardiographic variables in canine myxomatous mitral valve disease.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) is influenced by the method used to estimate left ventricular volume. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different left ventricular volume estimation methods on quantitative MR assessment, using the modified Simpson's method of discs (Disc method) as a reference. Echocardiographic data from 167 dogs with MMVD and 19 healthy control dogs were analyzed. Regurgitant volume (RVol), body size-normalized RVol, and regurgitant fraction (RF) were calculated using diameter-based methods (Cube, Gibson, Meyer, and Teichholz) and compared with values obtained using the Disc method. All diameter-based methods showed significant positive correlations with the Disc method. However, Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated wide limits of agreement and systematic bias. Between-method discrepancies increased with advancing disease stage, with diameter-based methods tending to overestimate RVol and RF, particularly in dogs classified as American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) stages B2 and C/D. Although relative trends in regurgitant indices were consistent across methods, substantial differences were observed in absolute values. These findings indicate that diameter-based methods are not interchangeable with the Disc method for absolute quantification of MR severity in dogs with MMVD, especially in advanced disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.