ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Flexible Intramedullary Nails for Stabilization of Transverse Femoral Fractures in Cats: Ex Vivo Biomechanical Characterization.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible intramedullary nails (FINs) are commonly used in children and adolescents to treat long bone fractures, but few studies exist in animals. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FINS for the stabilization of transverse femoral fractures in cats. Fifteen bones were kept intact, while in another 15 bones, a mid-diaphyseal transverse fracture was induced and stabilized with two steel FINs of equal diameter, advanced divergently toward the greater trochanter and femoral neck, with end caps applied to the free ends. Five constructs and five intact bones were subjected to axial compression, four-point bending, and torsion tests. In axial compression, intact bones showed higher mean maximum force (1090.51 N vs. 608.43 N) and stiffness (845.98 vs. 298.86 N/m) than constructs. In bending, intact bones reached a maximum force of 1384.75 N, whereas a distinct maximum force could not be determined for the constructs; stiffness was also greater (1580.92 vs. 13.32 N/m). In torsion, intact bones demonstrated substantially higher mean maximum force (6.764 vs. 0.166 Nm) and stiffness (32.11 vs. 1.04 Nm/rad) than constructs. In conclusion, FINs with end caps demonstrate low construct stiffness, particularly under torsional loads, when used to stabilize mid-diaphyseal transverse femoral fractures in cats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.