Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42071835›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

ERAT combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the treatment of chronic appendicitis with giant fecal stones in the appendix: A case report.

Chun Gao, Xiang-Xiang Zhu, Wei Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-1007
Xiang-Xiang Zhu
Wei Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEndoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. However, its application in chronic appendicitis with giant appendicoliths is rarely reported. Such cases present a significant challenge for ERAT due to the difficult removal of large, impacted fecal stones using conventional techniques. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 40-year-old male presented with persistent right lower quadrant pain, tenderness, and elevated inflammatory markers. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal computed tomography confirmed appendiceal dilation and a giant fecal stone, leading to a diagnosis of chronic appendicitis with a giant appendicolith.

interventionsThe patient underwent ERAT, during which electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) was employed to fragment the large stone that was not amenable to direct extraction. OUTCOMES: ERAT combined with EHL successfully fragmented and removed the appendicolith, relieving the appendiceal obstruction. The patient's abdominal pain resolved promptly postoperatively, inflammatory markers normalized, and he was discharged on the second postoperative day. During a 12-month follow-up period, the patient remained asymptomatic, with follow-up imaging showing no signs of recurrence. LESSONS: ERAT combined with EHL is a safe and effective approach for managing chronic appendicitis with giant appendicoliths. This combined strategy overcomes the technical challenge of removing large, impacted stones via a minimally invasive, organ-preserving approach, avoiding the risks associated with surgical intervention. It represents a promising therapeutic alternative for these challenging cases.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAppendixCalculiLithotripsyAdultChronic DiseaseHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcomechronic appendicitiselectrohydraulic lithotripsyERATgiant appendicolithminimally invasive treatment

Identifiers

PMID42071835
PMCPMC13124324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.