ArticleMedicine2026
Abdominal ectopic pregnancy - misdiagnosed upper abdominal pain: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleEctopic pregnancy (EP) with implantation in the upper abdomen is exceptionally rare. It represents a challenging clinical scenario with very limited evidence confined to case reports. It seriously endangers maternal health and early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve patient prognosis. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a 25-year-old woman who was diagnosed several days ago with gastroenteritis was referred to our department because of worsened upper left abdominal pain. Contrast computerized tomography scan revealed a mass measuring ~46 mm × 40 mm × 56 mm in the upper left abdomen and her serum human chorionic gonadotropin level was 10,130.28 IU/L. EP was highly suspected on admission. DIAGNOSES: Abdominal EP was confirmed by intraoperative findings and postoperative pathology.
interventionsThe patient underwent laparoscopic surgery which went smoothly after admission. An gastrointestinal surgeon was involved during the surgery and the excision of the EP lesion along with partial omentum was performed. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged 5 days later after operation without complications. The serum human chorionic gonadotropin level declined to normal within 1 month follow-up. LESSONS: This case illustrates that although ultrasound is considered the first-line method for diagnosing EP, abdominal lesions with undefined nature detected by computerized tomography should also be pay attention to, especially for women of childbearing age presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms other than typical ones such as lower abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. Close monitoring and timely management are pivotal to improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.