ReviewBiology of sex differences2026
Sex differences in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: research status and progress.
Review in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in the risk of recurrence after catheter (CA) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) have become a focal point of interest in recent years. This narrative review synthesizes the available evidence and, based on published reports, suggests that female patients may have a higher overall risk of postoperative recurrence than male patients, although substantial heterogeneity exists across studies. This is a narrative review and did not follow the methodological framework of a systematic review (e.g., PRISMA diagram, risk-of-bias assessment, and quantitative synthesis). Sex differences are not driven by a single biological factor but arise from the complex interaction of multidimensional factors, including hormonal levels, electrophysiological characteristics, cardiac remodeling, and clinical management. Current research remains constrained by methodological heterogeneity, inconsistent endpoint definitions, and inadequate adjustment for confounders, which undermine the robustness of the conclusions. Future efforts should advance rigorously designed prospective studies to test current hypotheses. On this basis, the development of sex-sensitive, individualized management pathways-encompassing precise preoperative assessment, substrate-guided ablation strategies, and enhanced postoperative follow-up-may help improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.