SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Cancer risk from low-dose ionizing radiation in dental imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between low-dose ionizing radiation from dental imaging (conventional radiography and cone-beam/medical CT) and cancer risk using contemporary epidemiological evidence. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to March 2026 for observational cohort and case-control studies assessing cancer risk after dental radiographic exposure. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, causal inference with COSMOS-E guidance, and certainty of evidence with the GRADE framework. Random-effects models pooled adjusted Odds Ratios (ORs) and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsAmong 1,883 records, 24 studies met inclusion criteria, and 19 were included in meta-analysis (415,887 participants). In the 16 case-control studies, thyroid cancer was significantly associated with dental imaging (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.63-2.99), while central nervous system (CNS) tumors showed a non-significant elevation (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 0.89-1.91). In the three cohort studies, thyroid cancer showed a small but significant association with conventional radiography (HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.01-1.26), and CNS tumors risk was moderately associated with CT scan exposure (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.03-2.29). Certainty of evidence was rated low for thyroid cancer, and very low for central nervous system cancers, lymphoid cancer, oral cancer and salivary gland cancer due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision.
conclusionCurrent evidence is insufficient to confirm an association between low-dose dental radiographic exposure and cancer. A small increased risk was observed, but certainty remains very low, highlighting the need for well-designed prospective research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.