Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42071141›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Separative Techniques Coupled to Mass Spectrometry for Metabolomic Analysis.

Jasmine Hertzog, Marisa Maia, Vincent Carré

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasmine Hertzog *Université de Lorraine, Metz, France. jasmine.hertzog@univ-lorraine.fr.
Marisa Maia *Grapevine Pathogen Systems Lab (GPS Lab), Biosystems and Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vincent Carré *Université de Lorraine, Metz, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced analytical techniques are required to decipher metabolome complexity. The previous chapter ("Latest Developments in Mass Spectrometry-Based Techniques for Metabolomics Analysis") shows general aspect of mass spectrometry techniques for the detection, identification, and quantification of metabolites by target and non-targeted approaches. It also points out that, in some instances, the sole direct analysis by mass spectrometry is a limitation for deciphering the high molecular complexity of the metabolome. Therefore, upstream separative methods such as chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, or ion mobility can be an effective solution. Indeed, these techniques reduce the ion suppression effects, separate some isomers, and increase the capacity measurement for metabolite identification and quantification. This chapter focuses on the separative methods most frequently used in metabolomic studies. Their principles and some examples are addressed along with their coupling with MS.Lastly, analytical improvements and recent advances in MS hyphenated approaches for metabolomic study are also discussed with multidimensional analysis.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryMetabolomeMetabolomicsAnimalsElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryCapillary electrophoresisChromatographyIon mobilityMetabolomicsSeparative techniques

Identifiers

PMID42071141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.