ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Malignant Fungating Wounds in Advanced Cancer: Pathophysiology, Odor Control, and Dignity-Centered Management.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMalignant fungating wounds (MFWs) represent a profoundly distressing complication of advanced cancer, affecting an estimated 5-10% of patients with solid tumors and imposing a disproportionate burden on quality of life, caregiver wellbeing, and therapeutic engagement. Despite their clinical significance, MFWs remain a systematically neglected domain within oncology and palliative medicine. Existing literature addresses wound odor, wound myiasis, and dignity-related dimensions as isolated topics; a unified clinical framework integrating these three domains from both biological and ethical perspectives has been conspicuously absent. This review was designed to address that gap. The review introduces and applies a triple-framework approach to MFW management: (1) a Biological Dimension encompassing anaerobic microbial metabolism and volatile organic compound (VOC) generation; (2) a Clinical Dimension operationalizing evidence-based strategies for odor control and wound myiasis management; and (3) an Ethical Dimension centering dignity-conserving care as an indispensable component of oncologic wound management. This tripartite integration constitutes the primary conceptual contribution of this article. RECENT
findingsWound microbiome profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing has identified anaerobic genera including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, and Fusobacterium as principal contributors to the VOC profile responsible for MFW malodor, providing a mechanistic basis for targeted antimicrobial therapy. Biofilm-forming organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, create recalcitrant wound environments that resist conventional topical therapies. Topical metronidazole remains the most robustly supported intervention for odor control, with emerging evidence for cadexomer iodine and Manuka honey as biofilm-disrupting adjuncts. Wound myiasis, increasingly reported in tropical and resource-limited settings, benefits from stepwise management combining mechanical debridement, larval asphyxiation techniques, and systemic ivermectin for severe cases. Electronic nose (e-nose) technology and volatile compound analysis represent emerging diagnostic tools for objective odor quantification. Palliative radiotherapy-using hypofractionated regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions or single-fraction schedules in frail patients-offers biologically rational tumor cytoreduction with sustained improvement in odor and exudate. Community-based palliative care models, particularly those adapted for India and sub-Saharan Africa, demonstrate that dignified, evidence-informed MFW care is achievable within low-resource frameworks using trained community health workers and locally compounded or accessible wound care agents. Malignant fungating wounds demand a comprehensive, dignity-centered clinical response that is simultaneously evidence-based, culturally sensitive, and globally implementable. This review synthesizes the pathophysiology, evidence base, and ethical imperatives of MFW care into a unified clinical framework, providing oncologists and palliative care teams with practical algorithms for odor management and myiasis control, and reinforcing the imperative for equitable access to palliative wound care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42071136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.