Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42071136›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026

Malignant Fungating Wounds in Advanced Cancer: Pathophysiology, Odor Control, and Dignity-Centered Management.

Atul Kumar Gupta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Atul Kumar GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India. atulgupta455@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0000-8743-831X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMalignant fungating wounds (MFWs) represent a profoundly distressing complication of advanced cancer, affecting an estimated 5-10% of patients with solid tumors and imposing a disproportionate burden on quality of life, caregiver wellbeing, and therapeutic engagement. Despite their clinical significance, MFWs remain a systematically neglected domain within oncology and palliative medicine. Existing literature addresses wound odor, wound myiasis, and dignity-related dimensions as isolated topics; a unified clinical framework integrating these three domains from both biological and ethical perspectives has been conspicuously absent. This review was designed to address that gap. The review introduces and applies a triple-framework approach to MFW management: (1) a Biological Dimension encompassing anaerobic microbial metabolism and volatile organic compound (VOC) generation; (2) a Clinical Dimension operationalizing evidence-based strategies for odor control and wound myiasis management; and (3) an Ethical Dimension centering dignity-conserving care as an indispensable component of oncologic wound management. This tripartite integration constitutes the primary conceptual contribution of this article. RECENT

findingsWound microbiome profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing has identified anaerobic genera including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, and Fusobacterium as principal contributors to the VOC profile responsible for MFW malodor, providing a mechanistic basis for targeted antimicrobial therapy. Biofilm-forming organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, create recalcitrant wound environments that resist conventional topical therapies. Topical metronidazole remains the most robustly supported intervention for odor control, with emerging evidence for cadexomer iodine and Manuka honey as biofilm-disrupting adjuncts. Wound myiasis, increasingly reported in tropical and resource-limited settings, benefits from stepwise management combining mechanical debridement, larval asphyxiation techniques, and systemic ivermectin for severe cases. Electronic nose (e-nose) technology and volatile compound analysis represent emerging diagnostic tools for objective odor quantification. Palliative radiotherapy-using hypofractionated regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions or single-fraction schedules in frail patients-offers biologically rational tumor cytoreduction with sustained improvement in odor and exudate. Community-based palliative care models, particularly those adapted for India and sub-Saharan Africa, demonstrate that dignified, evidence-informed MFW care is achievable within low-resource frameworks using trained community health workers and locally compounded or accessible wound care agents. Malignant fungating wounds demand a comprehensive, dignity-centered clinical response that is simultaneously evidence-based, culturally sensitive, and globally implementable. This review synthesizes the pathophysiology, evidence base, and ethical imperatives of MFW care into a unified clinical framework, providing oncologists and palliative care teams with practical algorithms for odor management and myiasis control, and reinforcing the imperative for equitable access to palliative wound care worldwide.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOdorantsWounds and InjuriesHumansMyiasisPalliative CareQuality of LifeWound HealingBiofilmDignity in cancer careGlobal oncologyIvermectinLMICMalignant fungating woundsPalliative radiotherapyPalliative wound careTopical metronidazoleWound microbiomeWound myiasisWound odor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.