ArticleScientific reports2026
Palm and Eucalyptus waste-derived biochars for removing imidacloprid and myclobutanil from pesticide- contaminated water.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two biochars, palm petiole biochar (PPB) and eucalyptus leaf biochar (ELB), were prepared from palm (Phoenix dactylifera) petioles and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) leaves and evaluated as low-cost sorbents for the removal of imidacloprid and myclobutanil from aqueous solutions. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to examine the effects of adsorbent dose, pH, temperature, contact time, and initial pesticide concentration. The highest removal was achieved at pH 7, 25 ± 1 °C, 24 h contact time, a biochar dose of 5 g L⁻¹, and an initial concentration of 50 mg L⁻¹ for each pesticide. Thermodynamic analysis indicated that the adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic. Adsorption kinetics were evaluated using pseudo-first order and pseudo-second-order models, whereas equilibrium data were analyzed using the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm models. Among the tested equilibrium models, Langmuir and Freundlich provided the best fit to the adsorption data. PPB showed stronger practical removal performance than ELB. Under rapid-treatment conditions using 100 mg of biochar, PPB removed 87.4% of imidacloprid and 92.1% of myclobutanil, whereas ELB removed 66.6% and 80.0%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PPB and ELB, particularly PPB, are promising eco-friendly sorbents for the treatment of pesticide-contaminated water and concentrated agricultural point-source wastewaters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.