Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42071083›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Rhythmic alternate prioritization in auditory feature-based attention.

Burcu Bayram, Sude Sarayköylü, Ulrich Ansorge, Ulrich Pomper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Burcu BayramDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Vienna, 1010, Austria.
Sude SarayköylüDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Vienna, 1010, Austria.
Ulrich AnsorgeDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Vienna, 1010, Austria.
Ulrich PomperDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Vienna, 1010, Austria. ulrich.pomper@univie.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P 34755-GAustrian Science Fund ZK 66
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that attentional resources are distributed in a rhythmically alternating fashion between several simultaneously competing inputs. Most past research on this topic has investigated the visual modality, with some evidence of rhythmic sampling in auditory spatial attention. Here, we tested whether rhythmic sampling also extends to the auditory feature domain. Twenty-five human participants performed a challenging feature-based auditory attention task. On each trial, we presented an auditory cue (high or low tone) followed by a variable delay (250-1000 ms) and a target (high or low tone) at detection threshold, either congruent or incongruent with the cue (50% probability). By analyzing performance as a function of the cue-target interval, we arrived at three main results. First, sensitivity fluctuated significantly at a rate of 8 to 10 Hz for both congruent and incongruent targets, in line with cyclical waxing and waning attention towards the two features. Second, sensitivity in congruent and incongruent trials fluctuated out-of-phase with each other, suggesting an alternating prioritization of the two features. Third, across subjects, larger phase differences between conditions were associated with faster response times, indicating that alternate sampling facilitates task performance. In summary, our results demonstrate attentional sampling in yet another task domain and corroborate the idea of cyclic information processing as a key mechanism underlying information selection in the brain.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAlpha oscillationsAttentionAuditoryFeature-basedRhythmic processing

Identifiers

PMID42071083
PMCPMC13328441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.