Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2026
Impact of surgical assistance by Japanese nurse practitioners in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid workforce shortages, the involvement of advanced practice providers, such as Japanese nurse practitioners (JNPs), in surgical roles has been increasing. JNPs have recently begun assisting in cardiovascular procedures, including robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG); however, their clinical impact remains insufficiently characterized. This retrospective, single-center observational cohort study evaluated 199 consecutive patients who underwent RA-CABG using the left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery technique between 2020 and 2023. Patients were stratified according to the type of bedside surgical assistant: physician as bedside assistant (n = 108) and JNP-assisted (n = 91). Outcomes assessed included operative time, robotic time, anastomosis time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative complications, and learning curve analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The JNP-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time (p < 0.001), robotic time (p < 0.001), and anastomosis time (p = 0.005). No significant differences were observed in 30-day mortality,30-day graft patency, conversion to sternotomy, ICU stay, graft patency, or complication rates. In the JNP-assisted group, a significant negative correlation was observed between case number and operative time (Spearman’s ρ = −0.396, p < 0.001), suggesting that the primary surgeon’s learning curve was preserved. The involvement of JNPs as bedside surgical assistants in RA-CABG was associated with improved operative efficiency without compromising patient safety or clinical outcomes. These findings support the role of JNPs as valuable members of multidisciplinary teams in advanced robotic cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42071073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.