ArticleScientific reports2026
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exerts an anti-cancer effect in A549 cells in association with MEG3 and BCYRN1 regulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have reported that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein may suppress cancer cell growth. Here, we investigated the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in A549 lung cancer cells using recombinant spike protein (SP), spike protein transfection (SPT), and pseudo-SARS-CoV-2 virus (PSV). To evaluate its anticancer effects and associated molecular changes, we performed RNA sequencing, colony formation, immunofluorescence, cell viability, migration, FACS, western blotting, 3D spheroid, molecular docking, siRNA knockdown, qRT-PCR, apoptosis assays, and computational interaction analyses. Spike protein significantly inhibited the long-term growth of A549 cells. Among the delivery methods, PSV showed the most potent anticancer effect, followed by SPT and SP, as evidenced by reduced migration, spheroid growth, and increased sub-G1 arrest. RNA-Seq identified two differentially expressed lncRNAs, with MEG3 upregulated and BCYRN1 downregulated following spike-related treatment. Functional experiments showed that BCYRN1 knockdown or MEG3 overexpression reproduced key spike protein-induced antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects, including increased cleaved caspase-3 expression. Computational analyses suggested possible interactions between the Spike protein and these lncRNAs. In addition, actinomycin D (ActD) chase experiments indicated altered transcript dynamics of MEG3 and BCYRN1 under spike-related conditions. Collectively, these findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exerts antitumor activity in A549 cells and may contribute to the regulation of MEG3 and BCYRN1. Further studies, including formal rescue and biochemical interaction assay, will be required to establish causality and direct molecular mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.