ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Pelvic MRI-based machine learning models for age estimation and age threshold classification in living children and young adults.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAccurate bone age assessment is crucial in forensic medicine and pediatrics. This study aimed to systematically characterize the MRI developmental patterns of the iliac crest and ischial tuberosity and to develop machine learning models for age estimation and age threshold classification.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on pelvic MRI scans from 680 individuals aged 6-30 years. A four-stage method was used to assess ossification stages of the iliac crest and ischial tuberosity, followed by a descriptive analysis. We trained and test multiple machine learning models for: (1) regression models for continuous age prediction, and (2) classification models for determining legal age thresholds (12, 14, 16, 18 years). Models were validated on both internal and external test sets.
resultsInter- and intra-observer agreements were good (k > 0.9). the minimum ages for complete fusion of iliac crest and ischial tuberosity were 15.00 years and 15.75 years in males, while both 14.00 years in females. Chronological age and ossification stage showed strong positive correlations (r > 0.8). No significant differences were found regarding sex, sequence, or side (p > 0.05), except the side difference in female ischial tuberosity (p = 0.008). For age regression, the optimal model achieved a mean absolute error of 2.957 years on the internal set and 2.252 years on the external set. For classifying legal age thresholds (12, 14, 16, 18 years), models demonstrated outstanding performance, with the highest AUCs of 0.977, 0.992, 0.969, and 0.931 on the internal set, and 0.955, 0.984, 0.997, and 0.997 on the external set.
conclusionThis study provided foundational MRI reference data for pelvic apophyseal development and showed the exciting potential of integrating pelvic MRI with machine learning for age estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42071051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.