ArticleScientific reports2026
Genomic profiling and therapeutic targets of Thai melanoma revealed by next-generation sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic alterations represent key therapeutic targets in melanoma, but genomic profiles differ across ethnic groups and remain poorly defined in Thai patients. We characterized the somatic landscape of 33 melanoma samples (13 cutaneous, 13 acral, 7 mucosal) using the 501-gene OCA-Plus panel with next-generation sequencing, integrating clinical and genomic features. The somatic landscape revealed BRAF as the most frequently mutated gene, primarily involving the V600E variant, followed by KIT. Both BRAF and KIT emerged as significant drivers and exhibited mutual exclusivity, with BRAF mutations clustering specifically in cutaneous melanoma. Given the limited cohort size and heterogeneity, cross-ethnic comparisons of major mutational drivers revealed no statistically significant differences, necessitating further large-scale validation. Mutations in the RAS-MAPK and NOTCH oncogenic signaling pathways were the most frequent, and co-occurring alterations in MYC and Cell Cycle pathways were observed. Putative clinically actionable variants-primarily in BRAF, KIT, and NRAS-were present in 48.5% of patients, occurring most frequently in cutaneous melanoma. Notably, patients harboring KIT mutations showed a trend toward shorter disease-free survival, suggesting a potential prognostic role that warrants further investigation. These findings provide initial genomic understanding of Thai melanoma and highlight candidate actionable mutations for future precision oncology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.