ArticleScientific reports2026
Classifying and visualizing medication use in the ABCD study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medication use during adolescence provides important insight into current health and treatment patterns. However, these data are often difficult to analyze due to the complexity of medication labeling and classification. We present a reproducible framework that standardizes medication categorization in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study), improving analytic consistency and enabling more reliable findings across the research community. Parent-reported data on youth prescription and over-the-counter medication use from baseline through Year 6 of the ABCD Study were reviewed and harmonized. Medications were categorized using a combination of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System, artificial intelligence-assisted methods, and expert clinical input. A case study illustrated the utility of this tool by examining longitudinal associations between antidepressant use and youth-reported internalizing symptoms on the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM-Y). More than 6,300 unique medication entries were consolidated into 95 clinically meaningful categories, each coded across three recall periods (past 24 h, past 2 weeks, past year). The most common unique medication labels were for cold/flu/allergy (553) and acne treatments (355). In the case study, adolescents taking antidepressants showed a significantly greater reduction in BPM-Y internalizing scores over time compared to nonusers. This study introduces a standardized and reproducible classification of prescription and over-the-counter medication use in the ABCD Study. The resulting framework-accompanied by an interactive dashboard and publicly available code-facilitates new opportunities for researchers to examine how medication exposure relates to adolescent brain, neurocognitive behavior, and developmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.