ArticleScientific reports2026
Climate change scenarios across South-Kivu agroecological zones, Eastern D.R. Congo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing climate projections to capture agroecological heterogeneity and topographic gradients is essential for localized planning in complex terrains. This study evaluates historical trends and projected changes in temperature and precipitation across six agroecological zones (AEZs) in South-Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo under SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. We evaluated seven CMIP6 models using the Taylor Skill Score (TSS), selecting the three best-performing models per variable and AEZ to construct zone-specific multi-model ensembles. Bias correction was performed using Quantile Mapping (QM) with a two-fold cross validation design (1983-1998 and 1999-2014). Selected models demonstrated high ranking stability across independent historical windows, achieving a weighted mean stability index of 0.83 for precipitation, 0.94 for maximum temperature (Tmax) and 1.00 for minimum temperature (Tmin). For precipitation, BCC-CSM2-MR excelled in low-altitude zones, while CMCC-CM2-SR5 and MPI-ESM1-2-HR were more effective in high-altitude zones. MRI-ESM2-0 and GFDL-ESM4 performed best for temperature across most AEZs. Climate trajectories were analyzed for near-term (2026-2050), mid-term (2051-2075) and long-term (2075-2100) periods relative to a 1983-2014 baseline. Reported projections represent the ensemble mean, while inter-model spread is detailed in the results. Results indicate continuous warming across all AEZs, with Tmin increasing more rapidly than Tmax. Province wide for the near (long) term, Tmax increases range from 0.78 °C (1.64 °C), 0.82 °C (2.59 °C), to 0.87 °C (2.85 °C) under SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5; Tmin increases range from 1.08 °C (2.12 °C), 1.13 °C (3.12 °C), and 1.25 °C (3.46 °C), respectively. Precipitation projections reveal non-linear, AEZ-differentiated trajectories characterized by near-term reductions followed by a long-term transition toward wetting in several zones. The EMAZ exhibits persistent declines (-9.8%) and the THMAZ shows a late-century wetting (+ 21%) under SSP5-8.5. Furthermore, a shift in seasonal redistribution is projected, with the long rain season intensifying and the short rain season contracting. These findings characterize the range of plausible climate trajectories in South Kivu, providing a necessary evidence base for future risk-targeted adaptation planning in eastern DRC and comparable tropical mountain systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.