ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-modal deep learning framework for enhanced breast cancer diagnosis using mammograms and clinical data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fatality due to breast cancer is one of the most universal causes among women worldwide. The limited interpretation is due to tissue overlapping, high breast density and delicate lesion characteristics even though mammography is the standard screening tool. To overcome this universal challenges, we propose a multi-model deep learning framework that integrates mammographic image with structured clinical data (note: synthetic clinical variables were employed based on the known distributions of the risk factors due to the lack of real paired data) to achieve the accuracy in the diagnostics. Architectural developments establish promising directions for future multi-modal tactic with reliable clinical data. The architecture utilize a hierarchical fusion approach that incorporates with cross model attention mechanism and dynamic modality weighting to efficiently integrate heterogeneous features. Moreover, a region of interest care module is integrated to highlight crucial anatomical regions in mammograms. Experimental evaluations on a benchmark dataset validate a classification accuracy of 94.6% (95% CI: 92.8-96.4%) and an AUC of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.951-0.975), expressively overtaking prevailing baseline models (p < 0.01). These results suggested the significant potential of projected architectural framework as a proof-of-concept for steadfast and easily explainable clinical decision supporting tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.