ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2026
Clinical practice guideline recommendations for orthopedic surgical management of traumatic hip fractures: a systematic review.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHip fractures pose a critical orthopedic challenge, disproportionately affecting older adults and significantly compromising mobility and independence. The complexity of both the injury and the patient profile necessitates adopting best practices grounded in research evidence to optimize surgical management and recovery. This study comprehensively evaluated the quality and clinical applicability of existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the orthopedic surgical management of traumatic hip fractures and summarized key practice recommendations.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed across five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and PEDro) for CPGs published since January 2000. Two reviewers independently identified eligible CPGs using predefined criteria. The methodological quality of eligible CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II tool, which examines quality across the domains of scope, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. The complementary AGREE-REX tool was used to assess the guidelines' clinical relevance and applicability.
resultsSix CPGs were critically appraised, and two demonstrated high methodological quality scores (2009 SIGN and 2023 NICE CPGs). Across all CPGs, there was consensus emphasizing surgical timing within 24 to 48 hours after a hip fracture. In addition, most CPGs recommended against the use of preoperative traction. Recommendations for diagnostic imaging were supported by limited high-quality evidence. Domains addressing target users' values and resource feasibility scored lowest across CPGs, diminishing implementability.
conclusionsFewer than half of the appraised CPGs were rated high quality, and important clinical practice domains were insufficiently addressed. Orthopedic surgeons should follow recommendations to perform operative intervention within 24 to 48 hours after injury and avoid preoperative traction. The findings also underscore the need to develop CPGs with higher methodological rigor and more actionable practice recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.