Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42070903›Full record

SynthesisEarly intervention in psychiatry2026

Unravelling Distress in Psychotic-Like Experiences: A Systematic Review of Non-Clinical Populations.

Joachim Rockenschaub, Antonia Renner, Fabian Friedrich, Maximus Berger, Clemens Mielacher, Melanie Trimmel, Barbara Hinterbuchinger, Nilufar Mossaheb

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Early detection and intervention in at-risk mental states: rationale, structure, and clinical experience from a specialized outpatient service.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joachim RockenschaubClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4878-1857
Antonia RennerClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian FriedrichClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maximus BergerClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens MielacherClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Melanie TrimmelClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara HinterbuchingerClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nilufar MossahebClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are subthreshold psychotic phenomena that occur along the psychosis continuum and are frequently accompanied by distress. However, the factors underlying distress in individuals reporting PLEs-particularly within non-clinical populations-remain insufficiently understood. This systematic review aims to synthesise the evidence on factors directly or indirectly associated with distress in PLEs among non-clinical samples.

methodsA systematic search of Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane (January 2000-March 2025) using the terms psychotic-like experiences AND (distress OR resilience OR burden OR coping OR adaptive behaviour) identified 762 studies, of which 111 met inclusion criteria and were included in a narrative synthesis.

resultsDistress related to PLEs can be differentiated into direct PLE-related distress and indirect psychological distress. Factors associated with distress clustered into three domains: (i) Symptomatology-greater frequency, intensity, persistence and specific subtypes predict higher distress, as do comorbid depression, anxiety and suicidality. (ii) Psychological factors-maladaptive metacognitive biases, poor emotion regulation and avoidant or emotion-focused coping contribute to distress, whereas self-compassion and problem-focused coping may be protective. (iii) Environmental and contextual factors-traumatic life events, discrimination, daily stressors and substance use amplify distress, often by interacting with internal vulnerabilities and emotion regulation capacities.

conclusionDistress in PLEs arises from the interaction between symptom features, internal psychological vulnerabilities and external environmental factors. Consistent with emotion regulation models, distress reflects disruptions in adaptive appraisal and coping processes that heighten emotional reactivity. Conceptualizing distress as a transdiagnostic vulnerability underscores its relevance for early identification and preventive interventions. Future research should harmonise definitions of distress, examine longitudinal pathways and evaluate resilience-building approaches to mitigate risk and improve mental health outcomes.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressPsychotic DisordersStress, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalCoping SkillsHumansdistressgeneral populationpsychotic‐like experiencesrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42070903
PMCPMC13135910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.