ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Patients on statins with elevated transaminases: Frequency of follow-up creatine kinase testing and gastroenterology referral.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients on statins with elevated transaminases: Frequency of follow-up creatine kinase testing and gastroenterology referral.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo quantify how often creatine kinase (CK) is measured after newly elevated aminotransferases in statin users, and whether absent CK data are associated with gastroenterology (GI) referrals.
methodsRetrospective chart review of adult outpatients on statins with a first alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevation during a 5-year period at a large health system. The primary outcome was CK testing within 30 days; secondary outcomes included CK elevation rate and GI referral within 60 days.
resultsAmong 806 eligible patients, 22.8% (184/806) had CK measured within 30 days (median 9 days; IQR 5-17). Of those tested, 15.8% (29/184) had CK above the upper limit of normal (ULN); 3.6% (29/806) of the entire cohort therefore had unrecognized biochemical evidence of muscle injury. None had documented rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury or hospitalization. Among patients without timely CK testing (619/806), 4.7% (29/619) were referred to GI within 60 days; this proportion (3.6% of the total cohort) mirrored the fraction with CK elevation, suggesting potentially avoidable hepatic work-ups in the absence of muscle-specific testing.
conclusionsIn routine practice, CK is infrequently measured after new ALT/AST elevations in statin users, yet a non-trivial subset has biochemical myopathy. Reflex CK testing at the first abnormal transaminase could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary GI referrals while preserving effective lipid-lowering therapy. Prospective evaluation of reflex-testing pathways and tailored statin selection/dosing is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.