Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42070421›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2026

Clinical evaluation of deep learning accelerated 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Ivan Jambor, Ranjodh S Dhami, Madhangi Parameswaran, Eugene Milshteyn, Ajeetkumar Gaddipati, Mary Thomas, Arnaud Guidon, Ty Cashen, Miraj Rawal, Nabih Nakrour and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ivan JamborWentworth-Douglass Hospital, Enterprise Service Group - Radiology at Mass General Brigham, Dover, NH, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. Electronic address: ijambor@mgb.org.
Ranjodh S DhamiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Madhangi ParameswaranDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Eugene MilshteynGE HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA.
Ajeetkumar GaddipatiGE HealthCare, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mary ThomasGE HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA.
Arnaud GuidonGE HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA.
Ty CashenGE HealthCare, Waukesha, WI, USA.
Miraj RawalDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Nabih NakrourDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Azadeh TabariDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Susie Y HuangDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Clare Tempany-AfdhalDepartment of Radiology, Women's and Brigham's Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Mukesh G HarisinghaniDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital at Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Rory L CochranDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB030006 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Susie Yi Huang, BRUCE R ROSEN · 2020 to 2026
$10.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB030006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRoutine clinical 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is typically performed either as lower resolution breath-hold (BH) acquisition or higher resolution triggered navigator breathing (NAV) acquisition with a longer acquisition time, potentially limiting clinically applicability. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of MRCP obtained using a new deep learning acceleration approach, Sonic DL MATERIAL AND

methodsSixty-four and 32 patients underwent 1.5 T and 3 T MRCP scans, respectively. The standard 3D MRCP was obtained using a BH and NAV. Two SDL MRCP acquisitions for each magnetic field were performed with BH and scan times of 11-17 s, utilizing the SDL based acquisition and reconstruction technique. Three radiologists visually evaluated all MRCP datasets for 4 different features: overall image quality, image noise, image sharpness and artifacts. Differences were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank and chi-squared tests.

resultsAt both field strengths (1.5 T and 3 T) the proportion of overall image quality scores of 3 or higher (good, very good and excellent) and proportion of cases with reduced artifacts were better (p < 0.05) for both SDL MRCP acquisitions compared to the standard with NAV or BH. However, SDL MRCP was not superior to the standard MRCP technique for all evaluated feature categories and scoring varied between readers.

conclusionSDL MRCP demonstrated improved image quality consistency and scan time, however, variations between radiologists in quality scores were present, underlying the need for future development and validation.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceDeep LearningImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalPancreatic DiseasesAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAccelerated MRIDeep learning reconstructionMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Identifiers

PMID42070421
PMCPMC13264499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.