ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Healthcare Utilization and Recovery Duration After Ankle Fracture: A Claims-Based Study of Timeline, Costs and Complications.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleAnkle fractures are common orthopaedic injuries with wide variability in recovery duration and outcome. While long-term outcomes are well documented, less is known about the short-term recovery period. An updated analysis using claims data would provide greater clarity on short-term recovery patterns. AIMS AND
objectivesThe study aimed to characterise recovery duration after treatment for ankle fracture and to evaluate associations between comorbidities, perioperative complications, additional procedures and healthcare costs.
methodHealthcare claims from the IBM MarketScan database (2015-2018) were analysed to determine recovery costs for the index treatment and subsequent events including revision surgery, motion restoring surgery (MRS), rehospitalizations, and complication-related interventions. Recovery duration was defined as the interval between the initial surgery/treatment and the final physical/occupational therapy claim. Outcomes were summarised using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR).
resultsAmong 7,112 patients, the median index treatment cost was $5163 (IQR: $994-$12,444), and the recovery duration was 88 days (IQR: 36-492). Thirty-eight percent of patients required more than 6 months to complete recovery. Post-treatment complications were associated with markedly longer and more expensive recovery. Patients who required a complication-related surgery had a recovery duration that was 4 times longer and incurred costs that were 8 times greater than those without such events. Joint contracture and MRS were strongly associated with prolonged and costly recoveries.
conclusionThis claims‑based analysis identified wide variation in short‑term recovery after ankle fracture. Strong associations were demonstrated between complications, including joint contracture, MRS and rehospitalizations, and extended recovery duration and higher costs. These findings may help clinicians identify patients at risk for delayed recovery and support more informed decision‑making in early post‑treatment care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.