Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42070229›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of sociology2026

The Worldviews of Elites: Differences Between Inheritors and Newcomers.

Gabriel Otero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gabriel OteroSchool of Sociology, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-5699

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo ANID/ FONDECYT/11240249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to examine variations in the political attitudes of elites in Chile concerning two key dimensions: socioeconomic attitudes (concerning redistribution, taxation, and state provision of services) and sociocultural attitudes (concerning immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, and democratic values). I propose a framework that underscores the potential impact of the source of elite power-whether economic, political, or cultural-in shaping differences in political attitudes. Additionally, I suggest that patterns of intergenerational persistence and mobility (e.g., being born into an elite family) may contribute to variations in attitudes among elite individuals. To test the study's expectations, I use survey data collected between 2019 and 2020 from a sample of 416 individuals belonging to Chile's economic, political, and cultural elites. Using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), findings reveal substantial variation in political attitudes among elite individuals, with socioeconomic and sociocultural orientations strongly aligned. Explanatory analyses using multivariate regression models reveal that variations in attitudes among elite individuals are largely shaped by their elite type and social origins, with members of the economic elite and those from elite origins displaying the most conservative and inegalitarian views on both dimensions. Moreover, significant attitudinal tensions are observed between inheritors and newcomers, not only across the elites as a whole but also within the economic, political, and cultural elite groups.

Indexed as

AttitudeEmigrants and ImmigrantsPoliticsAdultChileFemaleGender EquityHumansMaleSocial GroupSocial ValuesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesChilecultural eliteeconomic elitepolitical attitudespolitical elite

Identifiers

PMID42070229
PMCPMC13536506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.