ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Health-related quality of life measures in incarcerated populations: a scoping review.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncarcerated populations face greater health challenges, including higher rates of communicable and mental diseases. However, traditional health measures like disease prevalence and life expectancy do not capture their physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being. This scoping review will summarize the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in incarcerated populations using preference-based HRQoL instruments (and measures that can be used to derive utility scores), providing insights for health policies and economic evaluations.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Six electronic databases and three health technology assessment agencies were searched for peer-reviewed studies reporting preference-based HRQoL or HRQoL scores that can be used to generate health state utility values in incarcerated populations. Eligibility and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers.Findings were synthesized to identify knowledge gaps.
resultsTwenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, primarily focusing on male and white populations. Ten studies targeted disease-specific populations, with mental health disorders (n = 7) being the most prevalent. Across studies, inmates generally reported lower HRQoL scores than the general population, especially those with mental health issues. Female and Indigenous inmates had lower HRQoL scores than male and non-Indigenous inmates.
conclusionThe variety in HRQoL instruments used, with each assessing different domains, hinders direct comparisons between studies. Validating instruments specific to incarcerated populations may be needed for future research. Overall, incarcerated populations, especially women and Indigenous inmates, demonstrate poorer HRQoL than the general population. There is a need for more diverse, inclusive studies to address these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42070186What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.