Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42070178›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Echolocating free-tailed bats use vision and hearing but not magnetoreception when navigating a maze.

Katherine Lemus, Rachel Meyers, Samuel Ellis, Eugenia Belova, Samantha Nichols, Trinity Reagan, Connor Hastcoat, Cara Webster, Michael Smotherman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katherine LemusDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Rachel MeyersDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Samuel EllisDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Eugenia BelovaDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Samantha NicholsDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Trinity ReaganDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Connor HastcoatDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Cara WebsterDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA.
Michael SmothermanDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3258, USA. smotherman@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-8152

Funding

National Science Foundation IIS-2423838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insectivorous bats navigate mainly by echolocation, but may also use visual, olfactory, and magnetic cues when travelling long distances. Parsing the relative contributions of different senses for navigation is difficult in wild bats. In the lab, spatial navigation in rodents is often studied using different maze assays, including the widely employed multiple T-mazes. Here, we trained crawling Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) to navigate a multiple T-maze within an artificial magnetic field and then manipulated the sensory environment to quantify the relative importance of vision, hearing and magnetic field cues on their navigation performance. We predicted that in addition to echolocation, visual and geomagnetic sensory cues might provide significant contributions to bat navigation performance. We hypothesized that (1) randomly reversing the polarity of the magnetic field, (2) changing color or removing light from the arena, or (3) presenting an acoustic jamming stimulus would increase mean maze travel times. Results showed that reversing the magnetic field had no significant impact on maze travel times under any conditions. However, in total darkness, mean travel times increased by 75% relative to both broad spectrum white light and red light. Travel times under red light were longer but not significantly different from white light. Playing an acoustic jamming stimulus mimicking the pulses of other bats significantly increased mean travel times by ~ 50%. These results show that insectivorous bats supplement biosonar with visual cues during navigation, but we found no evidence of a contribution from magnetoreception.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEcholocationHearingMaze LearningSpatial NavigationVision, OcularAnimalsCuesFemaleMagnetic FieldsMaleBatsEcholocationMagnetoreceptionNavigationSpatial memoryVision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.