ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Echolocating free-tailed bats use vision and hearing but not magnetoreception when navigating a maze.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insectivorous bats navigate mainly by echolocation, but may also use visual, olfactory, and magnetic cues when travelling long distances. Parsing the relative contributions of different senses for navigation is difficult in wild bats. In the lab, spatial navigation in rodents is often studied using different maze assays, including the widely employed multiple T-mazes. Here, we trained crawling Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) to navigate a multiple T-maze within an artificial magnetic field and then manipulated the sensory environment to quantify the relative importance of vision, hearing and magnetic field cues on their navigation performance. We predicted that in addition to echolocation, visual and geomagnetic sensory cues might provide significant contributions to bat navigation performance. We hypothesized that (1) randomly reversing the polarity of the magnetic field, (2) changing color or removing light from the arena, or (3) presenting an acoustic jamming stimulus would increase mean maze travel times. Results showed that reversing the magnetic field had no significant impact on maze travel times under any conditions. However, in total darkness, mean travel times increased by 75% relative to both broad spectrum white light and red light. Travel times under red light were longer but not significantly different from white light. Playing an acoustic jamming stimulus mimicking the pulses of other bats significantly increased mean travel times by ~ 50%. These results show that insectivorous bats supplement biosonar with visual cues during navigation, but we found no evidence of a contribution from magnetoreception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42070178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.