ReviewAngiogenesis2026
Evolving biopsy strategies for molecular profiling of brain arteriovenous malformations.
Review in Angiogenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) are increasingly recognized as dynamic vascular diseases driven by endothelial genetic alterations and dysregulated signaling pathways, rather than as static structural anomalies. Accumulating evidence from both hereditary and sporadic forms of BAVMs has established endothelial signaling dysfunction as a central pathogenic mechanism underlying aberrant angiogenesis, progressive lesion remodeling, and vascular instability that predisposes to hemorrhage. These insights have fundamentally shifted the conceptual framework of BAVMs toward a pathway-driven disease model. Despite this progress, direct access to biologically informative molecular material from living AVM lesions remains limited, posing a major barrier to detailed mechanistic interrogation and the translation of molecular insights into clinical decision-making. Historically, molecular characterization of AVMs has relied almost exclusively on surgically resected tissue, restricting analyses to selected patient populations and frequently reflecting late-stage disease biology. Such approaches provide limited insight into disease initiation, temporal evolution, or treatment-induced molecular changes. Recent advances in minimally invasive biopsy strategies, particularly those leveraging endovascular access, have begun to overcome these limitations by enabling molecular interrogation of AVMs in vivo. In this mini review, we summarize emerging approaches for molecular profiling of AVMs, with a primary focus on BAVMs, while also drawing on relevant studies in extracranial and other arteriovenous malformations that share common endovascular access routes, technical principles, and translational implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42070161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.