ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
The Utilisation of Genetic Counselling Services Amongst Prenatal Healthcare Providers in Gauteng, South Africa.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolving role of genetic counselors in South Africa: A decade of growth.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCongenital anomalies and genetic disorders contribute substantially to perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Prenatal healthcare providers play a key role in identifying affected pregnancies and referring to patients for genetic counselling; however, referral practices remain suboptimal.
objectiveTo assess the utilisation of genetic counselling services and perceptions of genetic counselling among prenatal healthcare providers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.
methodAn electronic survey was distributed to prenatal healthcare providers working in public and private healthcare sectors in Gauteng. The survey assessed access to genetic counselling services, referral practices, knowledge of referral indications, understanding of the genetic counsellor's role, and perceived barriers to referral. Fifty-four respondents were included.
resultsSeventy-four percent of participants reported being able to refer to patients for genetic counselling, but only 57% had utilised the service. No participant correctly identified all appropriate referral indications, and only 24% understood the scope of practice of genetic counsellors. Only 6% felt confident in their knowledge of genetic counselling.
conclusionAlthough genetic counselling services are available and utilised in Gauteng, they are not accessed to their full potential. Improved education and clearer referral guidance are required to optimise prenatal genetic care in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.