Trial reportScandinavian journal of pain2026
Evidence for frequency-dependent neuronal "wind-up" origin of temporal summation of pain - an experimental crossover investigation.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRepetitive noxious stimulation can increase perceived pain intensity, a phenomenon known as Temporal Summation of Pain (TSP), thought to reflect central sensitization via neuronal "wind-up" in the spinal cord. As neuronal wind-up occurs only at stimulation frequencies above 0.2 Hz, we have tested whether TSP also appears at two different frequencies using our recently developed TSP protocol in healthy volunteers.
methodsIn a randomized crossover design, 30 healthy male participants (27±4 years) underwent two experimental sessions involving 90 repetitive heat stimuli applied to the forearm at individually determined pain tolerance temperatures. Stimuli were delivered using a thermode at either 0.4 or 0.15 Hz. Pain intensity was rated using a computerized visual analog scale (0-100). TSP was assessed via linear mixed-effects model (LMM), with pain intensity as the dependent variable.
resultsAll participants finished the study. LMM revealed a significant main effect of stimulation frequency (
conclusionsThe presence of TSP at 0.4 Hz but not at 0.15 Hz aligns with previous findings on neuronal wind-up, supporting its reliance to central sensitization. These findings enhance our understanding of the physiological basis of TSP and offer a robust platform for future investigations into pain modulation and therapeutic intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42070080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.