SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of the aging of the global population, the prevalence of knee joint disorders continues to rise. Concurrently, the integration of robotic systems and intelligent implants represents an inevitable trend in orthopedic surgery. A comprehensive evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is therefore urgently needed to inform clinical decision-making.
objectiveTo explore the advantages of 9 RA-TKAs across 8 outcomes.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to December 1, 2025. The risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed via Review Manager (version 5.4). Network meta-analysis was performed via RStudio (version 4.4.1).
resultsA total of 36 studies involving 2841 patients were included. In direct comparisons, conventional TKA (C-TKA) yielded shorter operative times than MAKO, HURWA, SkyWalker, ROSA, and Brainlab Knee did. CORI also had a shorter operative time than Brainlab Knee did. Compared with the C-TKA, MAKO, HURWA, SkyWalker and TiRobot groups, the ROSA group presented higher KSS-knee scores. In addition, C-TKA, HURWA, and CORI presented higher KSS-knee scores than did SkyWalker. For the KSS-function scores, the C-TKA and ROSA scores were higher than the HURWA score. C-TKA demonstrated a greater postoperative ROM than HURWA did. For HKA angle deviation, C-TKA resulted in greater deviation than MAKO, HURWA, SkyWalker, TiRobot, and EPMEDBOT did. In the comprehensive best probability ranking, C-TKA (93%) ranked highest in terms of operative time. SkyWalker (87%) ranked highest in terms of blood loss. SkyWalker (91%) ranked highest in terms of the KSS-knee scores. HURWA (87%) ranked highest in terms of the KSS function scores. MAKO (85%) ranked highest for HSS. The YUANHUA (76%) ranked highest for the WOMAC. The CORI (69%) ranked highest for ROM. SkyWalker (87%) ranked highest for HKA angle deviation.
conclusionsOverall, RA-TKA demonstrated superior safety and effectiveness compared with C-TKA, with different robotic systems exhibiting distinct advantages across outcome measures. Nevertheless, C-TKA retains a significant advantage in reducing the operative time, highlighting an important area for further optimization of robotic-assisted TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.