ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Determinants and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients under 75 with prior cardiac surgery: insights from the Netherlands Heart Registration.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA history of prior cardiac surgery (PCS) determines treatment decision and long-term outcomes in patients requiring aortic valve replacement. This study examined patient profiles, treatment-decisions and long-term outcomes of patients under 75 years with PCS undergoing transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation/replacement (TAVI, SAVR) in the Netherlands.
methodsData from 1,284 patients (ages 50-75 years) with PCS undergoing TAVI or SAVR between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using data from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Logistic and cox regression identified determinants of treatment selection and long-term mortality. Determinants were considered impactful if they had an odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) of ≥ 1.5 or ≤ 0.7 and a prevalence of ≥ 5%.
resultsOf 1,284 patients, 690 underwent TAVI (54%) and 594 SAVR (46%). Prior index surgery most frequently involved coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (57% in the TAVI group vs 40% in the SAVR group; p < 0.001) and previous aortic valve surgery (25% vs 51%; p < 0.001). TAVI patients were significantly older (median 71 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher EuroSCORE II (median 5.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.003) than SAVR patients. SAVR was the preferred strategy for intermediate-risk patients (62%), while TAVI was favored in high- and prohibitive-risk patients (62% and 94%, respectively). In descending order of odds ratio, the strongest independent determinants of TAVI selection were left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30% ((OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 2.6-8.8), poor mobility ((OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.6-7.0) and obesity/cachexia (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 1.6-4.4); the key determinants of SAVR selection were pure native aortic regurgitation (OR: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.3) and failing surgical bioprosthesis (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-1.0. Thirty-day, 1- and 5 year survival after TAVI and SAVR was 97% and 96%, 83% and 91%, and 56% and 83%, respectively (p-value < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30% and chronic lung disease were important mortality determinants for both procedures, with higher odds ratios for mortality in SAVR as compared to in TAVI patients.
conclusionsIn the Netherlands, TAVI and SAVR rates were comparable among patients < 75 years with PCS. Higher-risk patients were directed toward TAVI except for those presenting with pure native aortic regurgitation and bioprosthesis failure who mainly received SAVR. Severe left ventricular dysfunction and chronic lung disease were key mortality predictors for both procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.